LABOR DISPUTES AND STRIKES
Abstract
This article analyzes labor disputes and strikes from sociolegal and economic perspectives. The introduction highlights the importance of labor relations in the development of society, the factors leading to disputes, and the historical as well as contemporary role of strikes. The research methods include the analysis of legal and regulatory documents, comparison of statistical data, and review of scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the main causes of strikes are insufficient wages, unsatisfactory working conditions, and weak social protection mechanisms. In the discussion section, these results are compared with international practices, emphasizing both their positive and negative aspects. In particular, while strikes serve as a means of protecting workers’ rights, they can also negatively affect economic stability. The study concludes that mediation and the development of social dialogue are essential factors in resolving labor disputes.
References
Keith Malek (2005). Labor Conflicts: The Case of a Strike at Two
Supermarkets. Beyond Intractability. Retrieved from:
beyondintractability.org.
Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (2018). Labor Dispute.
Retrieved from: en.wikipedia.org.
Chris Honeyman (2013). Managing Labor Conflict. Beyond
Intractability. Retrieved from: beyondintractability.org.
Paul H. Sanders (2018). Types of Labor Disputes and
Approaches to Their Resolution. Duke Law Scholarship. Retrieved from:
scholarship.law.duke.edu.
David Smith (2018). Types of Industrial Conflict. Bizfluent.
Retrieved from: bizfluent.com.
Labor Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. In: Collection of
Legislative Acts of the Republic of Uzbekistan. – Tashkent: “Adolat”, 2005.
No. 52, Articles 553–554.
Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Labor Protection. Bulletin
of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2002, No. 1, Article 20.
Regulation on the Representative for Labor Protection, approved
by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan, registered on
December 18, 1995, No. 196







